TWO FAMOUS NESSIE HOAXES!

The most famous of all images of Nessie was taken supposedly on April 1, 1934, and as has been openly published many times over the years, the image is of a toy submarine with an added monster head and neck made of plastic wood. The photo at right shows a modern version, not the original.

Water has a property called by physicists "scale noninvariance." What this means in practice is that a small section of a large body of water looks and behaves absolutely nothing like a large section of the same body of water. Physicists have been pointing out for many decades that this famous Loch Ness photo shows a very small section of water, relatively close to the camera, and based on the height of the ripples, the neck of the monster would have to  be very roughly a foot long! This was later confirmed by the pranksters who took the original photo.

In about 1970 a wealthy character named Robert Rines decided he would take the definitive images of the Loch Ness Monster. He had a special underwater camera with brilliant lights, designed by Prof. Harold Edgerton, that could be towed underwater to take flash photos. However, remember that the water of the Loch is so murky that light travels only a few feet. At various times between 1972 and 1975 he towed his camera, taking tens of thousands of photos at random, hoping to catch the monster. When the exposed film was examined all frames appeared to be blank other than for a few, which showed very weak exposure of scattered areas. Rines got permission to have his images computer enhanced by the Jet Propusion Laboratory, famous for its work with photos taken by space probes. A handful of the enhanced images dimly showed various patches of debris on the bottom of the Loch. But when the images were published, they had been extensively and artistically retouched to show parts of a plesiosaur-like monster. They were basically computer art, not photos. For a summary of the extremely sad and unnecessarily complex saga, click here. So many enthusiastic but mentally slightly cracked folks were involved, it is in retrospect unclear just who was fooling who.








It is worth mentioning that monsters have been reported in almost every large lake on earth, in rivers, and even in small ponds. There is a lot of similarity between monster reports and UFO reports. Anything in the sky that the observer perceives as unusual, no matter how commonplace it is, is a genuine UFO, probably a space ship from another world! Wow! Similarly, anything in the water that is not immediately identifiable to the observer, who is usually someone completely unfamiliar with the location, and common things to be seen there, can only be some kind of aquatic monster! Double wow!!
THE GREAT SEA SERPENT!!